Archive - Family RSS Feed

Purity Week Post #2 : Purity Starts in the Mind

Welcome to “Purity Week.” Our goal for this week is to share with you four posts that deal with sexuality and purity. The posts will come out today, Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday (our monthly email newsletter will be released on Tuesday). To make sure you don’t miss a post, simply click here to subscribe for free.

——————————-

The class slumps into their seats as the youth minister starts to “go there” again. He starts talking about how sex is only for marriage and that it is sinful to engage in sexual activity before entering marriage.

…and eyes glaze over, because they have heard this over and over.

But the struggle for many–not just teens–is that we don’t often address the real issue. Sexual purity is not just “the act,” it starts in the mind. It begins with what we are thinking.

3138247450_e2395c7543

Jesus clearly condemned adultery, but then took that sin to its root issue. He said, “Everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart” (Matthew 5:28, ESV). The heart’s intent is the matter, and we know what we intend. We may try to explain it away, but we cannot trick ourselves or our Lord about our intentions.

Paul listed what our minds should be meditating upon in Philippians 4:8. Right there in the midst of those things? “Whatever is pure.”

Too often, we struggle with impure actions, but it is because we struggle first with impure thoughts. What we put into our minds becomes what we dwell on in our thought life.

Pure in…pure out.

Impure in…well, we may  not “act out” the impurity, but our thoughts and emotions will hold on to them. And such is what leads to an impure heart.

So, if I am not turning the channel when the bikini girls try to sell me a beer, guess what visuals I will have in my mind?

If I pay my own money to watch movies containing sexual themes, guess what I’ll be thinking about?

If I’m letting everyone else go to bed so I can stay up for a few minutes of online porn, it isn’t hard to figure what my mind will be envisioning the next day.

If a Christian woman is reading “romance” novels (yes, the quotation marks were intentional), how can she claim that her thoughts are pure about sexuality?

So, when we start to talk about this issue of purity with anyone, whether a teenage class at church or to ourselves, we need to start at the root issue. Is my heart and is my mind fully devoted to God? If I claim to be a follower of the Lord, I will love Him with all my heart, soul, mind, and strength (Mark 12:30).

And since He is holy and pure, so must be my mind.

QUESTION: Why do we struggle with “thought” purity?

—————————–

Photo credit: Shaheen Lakhan on Creative Commons

Photo credit: Tim on Creative Commons

To receive our blog posts via rss, click here. To subscribe via email, click here.

Click the banner to visit our publishing website

 

Purity Week Post #1 : Ivory Soap Isn’t Good Enough

Welcome to “Purity Week.” Our goal for this week is to share with you four posts that deal with sexuality and purity. The posts will come out today, Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday (our monthly email newsletter will be released on Tuesday). To make sure you don’t miss a post, simply click here to subscribe for free.

———————————

Often when speaking about purity, I have used an illustration from ads for Ivory Soap. For many years, that brand of soap was marketed as being “99 44/100% pure.”  In fact, one of their jingles used to include the lyrics:

I want my clean as real as Ivory;

It’s gotta be 99 point 44.

But, when I talk about purity, I like to ask the question: “What’s the other 56/100%?” In other words, how can you have something that is “pure,” but then admit that part of it is not pure!

2114165814_5429334220_z

The very first definition of “pure” is “free from anything of a different, inferior, or contaminating kind.” So, to claim that something is “almost” or “mostly” pure is really a contradiction in terms. It just doesn’t make logical sense.

But as we begin Purity Week, I want us to consider that this is how we often treat the subject of sexual purity. We seem to be comfortable with being 99 44/100% pure.

After all, there are very few areas of our life where you will hear Christians say that “As long as we don’t…, then we are okay.” But, for some reason, we will do that with sexuality. We know that the sexual relationship is not only designed by God for marriage, but that He has commanded that sex be only inside the bonds of marriage. So, for many people, we will see just how far we can go without crossing some line that we have set. We are “mostly pure” in our minds.

That just isn’t good enough!

God demands purity, and that does not mean that we can set some line of our own making and then think, if I don’t cross that self-made line, I am being pure. So long as we don’t “go all the way,” we are being pure. Where did we ever get that idea?

God, in the area of sexuality, has told us that we need to avoid making some attempt at seeing  how close to “crossing the line” we can get and still be acceptable.  The Bible clearly says, “Flee fornication” (1 Corinthians 6:18). Eugene Peterson begins the discussion that runs from verse 18 through verse 20 by paraphrasing Paul’s words as “There’s more to sex than mere skin on skin” (The Message). While an obvious paraphrase, Peterson could not be more correct in his interpretation of the Apostle’s thoughts! When we begin attempting to set our own “how far is too far” boundary, we are not really striving for purity.

Anyone who is biologically “of age” knows that the feelings of sexuality come upon us very quickly, and that it can be easy to become lost in the moment. However, just because the feelings are strong does not give us the right to give into those emotions or feelings and push God’s standard aside. Thinking “we didn’t go as far as so-and-so” or “well, we didn’t do such-and-such” has never been the standard of our Lord. His standard is is Himself, a perfectly pure Being.

It turns out that what is 99 44/100% pure isn’t really pure, after all.

Ivory Soap’s standard just isn’t good enough if we are going to be people of true purity.

QUESTION: Why do we think that “almost pure” is good enough?

————————————

NOTE: This will be the final post before our free monthly newsletter is released on Tuesday. If you would like to join over 180 people who get this free monthly resource, click here.

————————————

Photo credit: Tim on Creative Commons

To receive our blog posts via rss, click here. To subscribe via email, click here.

Click the banner to visit our publishing website

 

Ryan Christopher Anderson

Today’s post is a bit different, but I hope you will read all the way to the end. I want to tell you about Ryan.

When we moved here, Ryan was one of the first ones in our house. Nearly from day one, he helped us get to know more about local news and places to shop and eat. Since we were not from Nashville, this was a huge help. He seemed to know everything about everything: local sports teams, restaurants, stores, churches…everything.

3656928090_9185f23b37_z

Sadly, from day one, Ryan also decided to drop a few bad words in his conversations, even when the kids were around. We tried to drop a few subtle hints not to do that, but Mr. Anderson just said, “That’s just me. Deal with it.” Since he was so helpful, we let it go, but it was quite embarrassing.

As the days rolled on, Ryan expanded his stories. He was, easily, the most knowledgeable and entertaining guest ever in our home. He was able to tell stories that were sometimes funny, sometimes dramatic, and sometimes tear-jerking. We listened to his stories almost every day, and Ryan’s ability to hold our attention was truly remarkable.

I must admit, as a preacher, I was jealous, because I try to hold people’s attention for just 25-30 minutes and seemed to fail more often than I succeeded. I tried to learn how to tell a story from Ryan, but he was just better at it.

Of course, with nearly every story he told, he dropped a few bad words. I’m embarrassed to say that we talked about confronting him, but we let him in day after day because we loved the stories and information. Thankfully, his language was tamer when the children around, but we noticed that they were starting to spout off a few choice words sometimes. As parents, we scolded and punished, but we knew where it was coming from, and we didn’t properly address the problem.

Finally, Ryan started bringing something to the house with him. When he came over, he started bringing a can of beer. He offered it to me. I refused, but didn’t have the guts to tell him not to bring it into my house. Also, he started staying later and telling longer stories. Mr. Anderson’s stories were amazing, but they were starting to effect other parts of our lives, due to their length, but also their language and attitude.

But they were so informative and entertaining!

We looked around one day, though, and realized that Ryan had basically taken over our lives. We had even rearranged our furniture to give him a chair we could all see so we could hear his stories night after night. Our sleep was less. We were putting out little fires with our kids’ language and attitudes.

So, one day, we finally stood up to Ryan.

But I will bet he still has a place in your house, and probably controls more of your life that you’d like to admit.

He is Ryan Christian Anderson.

R.C.A.

He was our television.

QUESTION: What is your reaction to this story? How can we improve?

——————————–

Photo credit: Heather Elias on Creative Commons

To receive our blog posts via rss, click here. To subscribe via email, click here.

To sign up for our free monthly enewsletter, click here.

Click the banner to visit our publishing website

 

Thank You for Modest Ladies

Last Saturday was the greatest day of the year: Leah’s birthday. It was quite the unusual day, though, as I conducted a funeral midday. Also, since it was Saturday, we had to get home a little earlier than normal, so I could look over my sermon notes. (See what preacher’s wives go through?)

Anyway, we were at a local mall, when Leah started talking about something that was upsetting her. I was oblivious, and it was a good time to be so. In front of us were two girls, probably around 20 years of age, who were wearing shorts that nearly redefined “short.” She told me that a man holding his child had watched these two girls walk…for a long time. I was glad that I had been oblivious, because I hadn’t seen the girls until Leah mentioned what was going on.

Later, we walked by the store that doesn’t keep any “secrets.” This time, knowing what I might see, I took the time to see if my shoes needed cleaning. (They do, by the way.)

Finally, Leah couldn’t take it any longer. She just said, “There’s no way a Christian lady can compete.” After a brief exchange, it was clear that she was talking about these displays of sexuality, both in clothing and in advertising. It was also clear that she was truly bothered by this.

…and so was I.

3707200396_36d147c0ef_z

So, today, I want to say “thank you” to Christian ladies who dress modestly. You are still fashionable and, of course, beautiful, but you do not allow the world to sway your standards of morality. You are mindful of God and His standard first, and you also are thinking of your Christian brothers.

As a man, I want to say “thank you.” I have a responsibility to keep my mind focused on what is pure (Philippians 4:8), but you help with that. You don’t load pictures of yourself in a swimsuit on Facebook for the whole world–including men–to see. You avoid showing parts of your body off that only your husband (or future husband) should ever see. You realize that sexuality is a strong temptation for the vast majority of men, and you refuse to be a stumbling block.

As a husband, I want to say “thank you.” Leah is gorgeous, and there is no more beautiful woman on the earth. But temptations are still real, and you aid me in keeping not only by body, but also my thoughts, totally centered on her.

As a dad to a young girl, I want to say “thank you.” You are a living example to my precious daughter. You are showing her that she can be fashionable and feminine, yet remain faithful to the standards of God. You are teaching her that her physical appearance is not all she is, but that she is far more.

As a dad to a young man, I want to say “thank you.” Having been a young man, I know how strong temptations are, and I also remember how they quickly become part of life. Turner is too young to feel them, but for how long? You are going to help him learn to respect ladies, not to just “get an eye-full” of them.

As a Christian, I want to say “thank you.” You are modeling modesty in an extremely immodest world. You are not letting the world shape your standards. You are showing Christ through even your choices of clothing.

I know this is a very difficult subject, and that finding modest clothing is getting more and more difficult. But ladies, please keep God’s standard as your highest priority. The rest of the world is really competing against you, and you have already won. You know that they feel like they have to dress immodestly to draw attention, but you draw attention both for your outward and inward beauty.

It isn’t a competition, but if it were, you would have already been declared the winner. Not by me, but by our Lord.

Today, I just want to say “thank you.”

————————–

Photo credit: net_efekt on Creative Commons

To receive our blog posts via rss, click here. To subscribe via email, click here.

To sign up for our free monthly enewsletter, click here.

Click the banner to visit our publishing website

 

The FCC, Nudity, Extreme Profanity, and Your TV

For years, some have tried to point out the declining morals we see and hear in our mainstream media. It is something I have preached very passionately about, partly because, well, I like to be entertained, so it is a struggle. But I also preach passionately about this issue because so many Christians seemingly do not care what comes across their iPod or TV screen.

The latest word from the FCC (Federal Communications Commission), though, should open our eyes. Parents, are you ready for your children to see full frontal female nudity at any time during the day on your TV in your living room?

434222041_27193d880c_z

If the latest consideration from the FCC comes to pass, that is exactly what will occur. Additionally, the ban would be lifted on what is called “extreme profanity.” The so-called “f-word” would be allowed on any TV show at any time of day, as would many other words.

By the way, if you think this is just some wild idea the FCC has dreamed up on its own, both NBC and FOX have tried for some time to get these “standards” lifted so they could continue to produce their “art.”

…or their trash.

We sit for hours on end before the true “American Idol.” Not the TV show…the TV itself. It has the place of highest priority in our house, and every seat in many rooms is oriented for our faces to see it. We plop ourselves down in front of it and watch whatever it puts before us. If it wants us to laugh, we laugh. If it wants us to cry, we cry.

And if it wants us to think that something is no big deal, we go right along with that, too.

Parents, when will we say “no” to so much television in our house for our children? Or, may I be so bold as to ask, when will we say “no” to so much TV for ourselves?

It is not a sin to watch TV. I enjoy some shows and love watching games when I get the chance. But for far too many Christians, we simply watch with no moral discrimination. If it’s on, we just have to see it. And any thinking of God and His standards are put on hold until the TV’s job of entertaining me is done.

Is this latest consideration from the FCC enough to wake us up?

Or will the TV idol win our allegiance yet again?

QUESTION: How do you control the TV viewing in your house?

[UPDATE 4/9/2013, 11:09 CST]: It has come to my attention that part of my wording is not accurate with the original FCC document. Honestly, I tried to work my way through the original, but could not, so I went with the source linked to in the post. I apologize for this, but went with it as accurate. The inaccuracy is that the FCC is not considering a total “lift,” but is looking at allowing “fleeting” and “non-repetitive” uses of nudity and/or profanity. While I obviously still stand by the overall message of this post, I wanted to make it clear that I was inaccurate (honestly so) in that part of the “report.” Thank you for understanding.

————————–

Photo credit: Jason Rodgers on Creative Commons

To receive our blog posts via rss, click here. To subscribe via email, click here.

To sign up for our free monthly enewsletter, click here.

Click the banner to visit our publishing website

 

Page 2 of 24«12345»1020...Last »